Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Chrysler Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1991No. Docket 117813PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.
Chrysler Corporation appeals by leave granted a Macomb Circuit Court order affirming judgment for plaintiff in this action for revocation of an automobile sale pursuant to Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, MCL 440.2101 et seq.; MSA 19.2101 et seq. On appeal, *339Chrysler alleges that the district court lacked jurisdiction because an action for revocation of acceptance is equitable in nature and the remedy of revocation of acceptance is not available against the manufacturer. We hold that while the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction, the remedy of revocation of acceptance is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fargo MacHine & Tool Co. v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Koperski v. Husker Dodge, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Ramirez v. AutosportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- GMAC v. JankowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Neal v. SMC Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Taylor Investment Corp. v. WeilDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Computer Network, Inc. v. AM General Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- DAVIS v. LaFONTAINE MOTORS, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.