Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. Autosport
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 4, 1982PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
This case raises several issues under the Uniform Commercial Code (“the Code” and “UCC”) concerning whether a buyer may reject a tender of goods with minor defects and whether a seller may cure the defects. We consider also the remedies available to the buyer, including cancellation of the contract. The main issue is whether plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Ramirez, could reject the tender by defendant, Autosport, of a camper van with minor defects and cancel the contract for the purchase of the van.
The trial court ruled that Mr. and Mrs. Ramirez…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Intermeat, Inc. v. American Poultry Incorporated and a & W FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Filley v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Herbstman v. Eastman Kodak CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Pomerantz Paper Corp. v. New Community Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- D'Ercole Sales, Inc. v. Fruehauf Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.