Smith v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is a petition * to recover compensation for a large tract of land on Greylock mountain chiefly covered with wood taken under St. 1898, c. 543, for the Greylock State Reservation, a mountain park in the county of Berkshire. Flowing through the land was a stream called Hopper Brook.
1. Apparently the principal element of value in controversy at the trial related to the quality and quantity of standing wood and timber, and the ease and expense of marketing it as lumber. No evidence was shown to have been offered by the petitioner as a part of his case touching the use of Hopper Brook as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Moulton v. Newburyport Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Sargent v. Inhabitants of MerrimacMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Lawrence v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Beale v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Newton Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Hall v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.