Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
REIF, J.,
with whom Kauger and Colbert, JJ., join, dissenting.
{1 The issue in this case is whether the claimant's petition for judicial review was *925sufficient to invoke the district court's jurisdiction. The majority holds the petition was not sufficient because it did not name the Board of Review as a defendant in the caption or style of the petition. The majority relies upon precedent that requires the appealing party to name all necessary parties in the petition for review. The majority also notes that (1) judicial review is a special proceeding, (2) the procedural requirements for judicial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Klopfenstein v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008