Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 15, 2010No. 107,100Published

1Dissent

REIF, J.,

with whom Kauger and Colbert, JJ., join, dissenting.

{1 The issue in this case is whether the claimant's petition for judicial review was *925sufficient to invoke the district court's jurisdiction. The majority holds the petition was not sufficient because it did not name the Board of Review as a defendant in the caption or style of the petition. The majority relies upon precedent that requires the appealing party to name all necessary parties in the petition for review. The majority also notes that (1) judicial review is a special proceeding, (2) the procedural requirements for judicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. Klopfenstein v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API