Legal Opinion

State ex rel. P.M.P.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 1, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LIHOTZ, J.A.D.

The threshold question posed on appeal asks whether a juvenile delinquency complaint, filed at the direction of a county prosecutor’s office, is the substantial equivalent of an indictment such that it initiates a formal adversarial proceeding and triggers a juvenile’s right to counsel. The trial court extended the protections of State v. Sanchez, 129 N.J. 261, 277, 609 A.2d 400 (1992), to juvenile proceedings, concluding the right to counsel afforded a juvenile charged with delinquency attached when the prosecutor’s office filed a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rothgery v. Gillespie CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. State v. PreshaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. P.M.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. State of New Jersey in the Interest of A.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. PmpSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. State ex rel. P.M.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API