Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pmp

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 29, 2009No. A-63 September Term 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

975 A.2d 441 (2009)

200 N.J. 166

STATE of New Jersey in the Interest of P.M.P.

A-63 September Term 2008

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 28, 2009.

Decided July 29, 2009.

Amira R. Scurato, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant P.M.P. (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney).

Daniel I. Bornstein, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State of New Jersey (Anne Milgram, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Bornstein and J. Vincent Molitor, Assistant Cape May County Prosecutor, on the briefs).

Christopher D. Adams, Roseland, submitted…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API