Legal Opinion

Britt v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1969No. 6919SC446PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

Plaintiffs’ first assignment of error relates to the orders of the court allowing defendants’ motion to strike certain allegations in the complaint. The portions of the complaint ordered stricken are summarized as follows:

1. (From paragraph 2 of the complaint.) Defendant Smith’s law firm had been sole attorneys for defendant Association for twenty-two years and he is also the attorney for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, “the largest automobile liability insurance carrier in the United States.” Defendant James Frazier is a full-time insurance agent representing the aforesaid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Foust v. Gate City Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Chappell v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. In Re Foreclosure of RegisterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Turner v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975
  2. Passmore v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Broughton v. BroughtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Leary v. Nantahala Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Britt v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API