Legal Opinion

Leary v. Nantahala Power and Light Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1985No. 8430SC1178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

By its appeal, defendant Power Company assigns error to various of the court’s rulings at trial, and to its award of prejudgment interest. By their cross appeal, plaintiffs assign error to the court’s entry of judgment for an amount less than the jury verdict, and to post-trial rulings with regard to costs. We find no prejudicial error in the trial or in the court’s ruling as to costs, but conclude that the court erred in awarding prejudgment interest on that portion of the judgment not covered by liability insurance, and in reducing, ex mero motu, the jury’s verdict.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Lowe v. TarbleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Haynes v. GlennSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of TucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. U.S. Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1989
  3. Wagner v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Petty v. Housing Authority of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Red Valve, Inc. v. Titan Valve, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API