Legal Opinion

Broughton v. Broughton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1982No. 8110DC58PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff's Appeal

Before an alimony award can be modified, the party seeking modification must show changed circumstances. G.S. 50-16.9. The change in circumstances must be substantial with a final decision based on a comparison of the facts existing at the original order and when the modification is sought. Britt v. Britt, 49 N.C. App. 463, 271 S.E. 2d 921 (1980).

Plaintiff first contends that the 1980 order made no findings about the financial condition of the parties in 1973. Because there was nothing with which to compare the facts in 1980, he asserts that it was an error to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. In Re HartsockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Marks v. MarksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Cockman v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API