Legal Opinion
Bruer v. Woodworth
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 26, 1927No. 8494PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a duly licensed osteopathic physician under the laws of Michigan, on June 30, 1927, applied to the collector of internal revenue of the United States for this district for registration and a permit to dispense narcotic drugs, offering to pay the federal tax therefor. The collector declined to receive the money, or to allow the registration and to issue the permit, upon the ground that the Attorney General for the state of Michigan had ruled that a practitioner of osteopathy is not a physician within the meaning of Act No. 92 of the Public Acts of 1923 (state…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Locke v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- People ex rel. Gage v. SimanIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Matter of Bandel v. . Dept. of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Waldo v. PoeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perry v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Fowler v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
- Georgia Ass'n of Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1940
- Georgia Ass'n of Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Hostetler v. WoodworthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.