Commonwealth v. Cohen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Hirt, J.,
Opinion by
Defendant, a duly licensed osteopath, was charged with prescribing morphine sulphate, a derivative of opium, in violation of Section 4 of the Anti-Narcotic Act of July 11, 1917, P. L. 758, 35 PS 854. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that the information upon which it was based, named and described him, the defendant, as “Theodore R. Cohen, D. O., a duly licensed osteopathic physician.” The lower court sustained the demurrer and quashed the indictment, whereupon the Commonwealth appealed, raising the narrow question whether one duly licensed under the acts of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Rodebaugh v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. KolskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Matter of Bandel v. . Dept. of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Waldo v. PoeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists, Pennsylvania Section v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Palmer v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Commonwealth v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.