Legal Opinion

Wells v. Wells

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1926No. 25,112PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by Henry Wells and Laura Myers against Nelson Wells and others to cancel certain deeds. So much of the complaint as is necessary to an understanding of the con troversy is substantially as follows: “That Anderson Wells died testate on July 14, 1914, and left surviving his children viz.: Nelson Wells, Henry Wells, and Laura Myers, being his only living children; that in October, 1909, he executed a will which has been duly probated, and the executor nominated in the will is now in charge of the estate; that at the time of making this will and continuously thereafter…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Blinn v. . SchwarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lucas v. FrazeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Reed, Admr. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Tompkins v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Brumfield, Tr. v. State Ex Rel. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API