Legal Opinion
Purk v. United States
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 12, 1989No. C-3-88-516PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS OF ALL DEFENDANTS (DOC. # 17, # 18, # 77); MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE UNITED STATES AS SOLE DEFENDANT BY DEFENDANT LIZ DWYER (DOC. # 46) TREATED AS MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION SUSTAINED; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
This case is now before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss of Defendants Hartzell Propeller and Shirley Fuller (Doc. # 17), Defendant TRW, Inc. (Doc. # 18), and Defendant United States (Doc. # 77) and the Motion to Substitute the United States as Sole Defendant by Defendant Liz Dwyer (Doc. # 46). The Motion of Defendant Liz Dwyer…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Geiersbach v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Husek v. Internal Revenue Service of the United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1991
- Zolman v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
- Purk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Chorazghiazad v. GatlinDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.