Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 2000No. 97-00078CR; CA A99979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(b). He asserts that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress based solely on his failure to appear at the time set for hearing of the motion. We review for errors of law and vacate and remand.

Following his arrest, defendant executed a pretrial conditional release agreement in which he agreed “to appear at all times and places as ordered by any Court having jurisdiction[.]” The agreement stated that should defendant violate any of its conditions, the court could revoke his release,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CarusoOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. LundahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DashnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. KimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. E. (In re J. R.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API