Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. E. (In re J. R.)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
*236Mother appeals from judgments terminating her parental rights to her three children, *715JE, JA, and F. She raises eight assignments of error, which fall into three broad claims: (1) the juvenile court erred when it continued the appointment of mother's guardian ad litem (GAL) from the permanency proceeding in the termination proceeding without holding a hearing; (2) mother's counsel was inadequate for failing to object to the continuation of the GAL's appointment; and (3) as a result, the juvenile court erred when it terminated mother's parental rights to JE, JA, and F.1 Mother's first claim is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SerranoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Department of Human Services v. T. L.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. M. D. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.