Legal Opinion

Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. E. (In re J. R.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 2019No. A167996 (Control); A167997; A167998; A167999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

*236Mother appeals from judgments terminating her parental rights to her three children, *715JE, JA, and F. She raises eight assignments of error, which fall into three broad claims: (1) the juvenile court erred when it continued the appointment of mother's guardian ad litem (GAL) from the permanency proceeding in the termination proceeding without holding a hearing; (2) mother's counsel was inadequate for failing to object to the continuation of the GAL's appointment; and (3) as a result, the juvenile court erred when it terminated mother's parental rights to JE, JA, and F.1 Mother's first claim is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. SerranoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Department of Human Services v. T. L.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. M. D. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API