Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 28, 2009No. 07CR0416; A137256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence, arguing that the trial court erred by basing the order solely on the prosecutor’s failure to appear at the time set for the omnibus hearing. Because our decision turns on the interpretation of a statute — ORS 135.037, set out below — we review for errors of law. State v. Fox, 165 Or App 289, 291, 995 P2d 1193 (2000). We vacate the order and remand.

Defendant was charged with reckless endangerment and assault stemming from an automobile accident that injured two pedestrians. Before trial, she moved to suppress evidence that she had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. CarusoOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. DesireyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. CarusoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LoboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Yoshida's Inc. v. Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Law ex rel. Robert M. Law Profit Sharing Plan v. ZempCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Huskey v. Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API