Legal Opinion

Grover v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action on a burglary insurance policy. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury, result ing in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $650. Defendant has appealed.

The facts, which were admitted at the trial, show that on or about August 15, 1924, during the term of the policy, a diamond ring of the value of $650, belonging to plaintiff’s wife, was stolen from a cabin at Pine Hurst Lodge, Deer River, Minnesota, then being occupied by plaintiff and his family while they were on their vacation on a fishing trip. The policy provided:

“IN CONSIDERATION OF…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Western Automobile Insurance v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. Taylor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. PanitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Park v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steinzeig v. Mechanics and Traders Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Adams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Newbill v. Union Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Bowden v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API