Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Panitz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 10, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This is a suit on -a policy of burglary or theft insurance for the loss of a lady’s fur -coat alleged to have been stolen from a porch adjoining; the- apartment of appellee on the second floor of 928 Ohauncey Avenue, Baltimore City.

By the terms of the policy, the company -agreed to indemnify the assured “for direct- loss- by burglary, theft or larceny of any of the property of t-he assured described in the- said schedule and stated therein to he insured hereunder, occasioned h-y the felonio-us abstraction from the interior of the home, building, apartment or rooms actually occupied by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chase v. . the Hamilton Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Downer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Driver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Quimby v. GreenhawkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  2. Offutt v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Christian v. Johnson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. County Commissioners of Prince George's County v. TimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  5. Leeds, Inc. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API