Legal Opinion

Steinzeig v. Mechanics and Traders Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1957No. 22531PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the sum of $560 in favor of the plaintiffs and against'the defendant on an insurance policy. This court has jurisdiction. Section 3, Article V, Constitution, V.A.M.S.

The petition alleges that defendant issued its Jewelers Block Policy to plaintiffs. That the premium therefor was paid and the policy in force; that on May 1, 1954, the plaintiffs suffered a loss of certain jewelry; that the loss occurred while the jewelry was in an automobile owned by one Morgan Skaggs, a salesman for the plaintiffs, which was forcibly entered and the jewelry, of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grand Lodge of United Brothers of Friendship & Sisters of Mysterious Ten v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Wells v. GoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Central States Life Insurance v. McElhinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Park v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Seelig v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. JMP Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. American Stone Diamond, Inc. v. Lloyds of LondonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  4. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. BrakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Hill, Lehnen & Driskill v. Barter Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API