Legal Opinion

Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 17, 1952No. 29287, 29703PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a Chinese corporation, filed these actions to recover the total sum of $798,584.64 on deposit in the defendant Bank. ' Defendant Bank filed answers asserting its willingness to pay the sum, but alleging that it was unable to do so because of conflicting claims of corporate authority to receive payment. Thereafter the attorneys for the plaintiff moved for summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor. Later, a second group of attorneys, claiming that they were the only attorneys empowered to represent the plaintiff Bank of China, filed a motion to dismiss these…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Vladikavkazsky Railway Co. v. New York Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Puget Sound Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Skandia America Reinsurance Corp. v. SchenckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. General Electric Credit Corporation v. TidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pederson v. LothmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API