Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Hinkley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 24, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

The defendants, Dana and Alice Hinkley, own a summer camp on Sheepscot Lake. Their lot has common boundary lines on the west and south with land of the plaintiff, Ralph Proctor. The location of those boundary lines is in dispute in this case. Proctor appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Waldo County, adopting a referee’s report that found for the Hinkleys and awarded them five hundred dollars in damages for trespass. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the referee made certain errors of law and certain clearly erroneous findings of fact. We affirm the judgment in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Milliken v. BuswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Bemis v. BradleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  5. Belmont v. Umpqua Sand & Gravel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Conary v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Taylor v. HansonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  3. Theriault v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Milligan v. MilliganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Matteson v. BatchelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API