Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Morganton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1966No. 355PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This Court has allowed the plaintiff to amend the complaint by attaching as an exhibit thereto a power of attorney executed by Calvin Fairchild ratifying the bringing of this action by Kirby Hall and authorizing him to prosecute it as attorney in fact. Under the rules, therefore, this is the only question to be reviewed here: Did the plaintiff make a sufficient showing to justify the court’s order continuing the temporary restraint, preserving the status quo until the final hearing? Injunctive relief is granted only when irreparable injury is real and immediate. Membership Corp. v. Light Co.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Starbuck v. Town of HavelockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Pee Dee Electrics Membership Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Wishart v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. United Telephone Co. of Carolinas, Inc. v. Universal Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Goodman Toyota, Inc. v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Addison Whitney, LLC v. CashionNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
  5. Biesse Am., Inc. v. DominiciNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API