Goodman Toyota, Inc. v. City of Raleigh
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Defendant argues that the preliminary injunction is improper in that enforcement of the ordinance will not irreparably injure plaintiff; that plaintiff, in its application for a preliminary injunction, failed to set out with particularity facts showing irreparable injury; and that any injunction restraining the enforcement of the ordinance is contrary to prior decisions involving injunctions and sign regulations. We agree with defendant that plaintiff has failed to set forth with particularity facts to support its claim of irreparable injury, and accordingly reverse the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- United Telephone Co. of Carolinas, Inc. v. Universal Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Grantham v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keith v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Goodman Toyota, Inc. v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Coble Dairy Products Cooperative, Inc. v. State ex rel. North Carolina Milk CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Goodman Toyota, Inc. v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980