Wishart v. City of Lumberton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The demurrer was properly overruled. If the governing authorities were preparing to put public property to an unauthorized use, citizens and taxpayers had the right to seek equitable relief. Rheinhardt v. Yancey, 241 N.C. 184, 84 S.E. 2d 655; Jamison v. Charlotte, 239 N.C. 682, 80 S.E. 2d 904; Brown v. Candler, 236 N.C. 576, 73 S.E. 2d 550; McGuinn v. High Point, 219 N.C. 56, 13 S.E. 2d 48; Bowles v. Graded Schools, 211 N.C. 36, 188 S.E. 615; Carstarphen v. Plymouth, 180 N.C. 26, 103 S.E. 899; Vaughan v. Commissioners, 118 N.C. 636, 24 S.E. 425; 52 Am Jur. 10.
“Where property is dedicated or…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Bloemer v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- City & County of San Francisco v. LinaresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reese v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Lewis v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Shaw v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Goldston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.