Legal Opinion
Beard v. New York Central Railroad
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 19, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 31854PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McNAMEE, District Judge.
The question here presented arises upon defendant’s motion for an order staying answers to interrogatories “until it is apparent that the answers will be used in the instant action rather than in the state court action of this same cause * * * ”. Combined with the motion are defendant’s objections to interrogatories 6 to 13 inclusive. For reasons presently to be stated, it will be necessary only to consider the motion to stay answers to the interrogatories.
In her action in this court plaintiff seeks damages for her alleged wrongful arrest and false imprisonment by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mottolese v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- De Seversky v. Republic Aviation Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Finkelstein v. BoylanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Bachrach v. General Investment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1973
- In re Upjohn Co. Antibiotic Cleocin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Rosenfeld v. Schwitzer CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Triax Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986