Legal Opinion

Triax Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 21, 1986No. 238-85CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SETO, Judge.

This government contract case comes before the court on three discovery motions, specifically, plaintiff’s motion to compel production of documents and defendant’s motions to stay discovery and for an order protecting from burdensome and duplicative discovery requests. For the reasons discussed below, we GRANT in part and DENY in part plaintiff’s motion to compel, DENY defendant’s motion to stay discovery, and GRANT in part and DENY in part defendant’s motion for a protective order. In the interests of judicial economy and efficiency, the court further ORDERS that this claim…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. CassityDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
  2. Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. First Heights Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. JZ Buckingham Investments LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API