Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Examiners
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 23, 1986No. A8302-00829; CA A32882PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*440NEWMAN, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of his action for a declaratory judgment that he may administer therapeutic and nutritional substances by injection. Defendants had moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it failed “to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim and state a justiciable controversy.” ORCP 21A. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiff is a licensed naturopathic physician. ORS 685.030(4) provides:
“Nothing in [ORS ch 685, which governs licensing and regulating naturopaths] shall be construed to:
“* * * * *
“(4) Authorize the administration of any substance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Central Oregon Irrigation District v. Deschutes CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Erwin v. Oregon State BarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Advance Resorts of America, Inc. v. City of WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Clark v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Waters v. Klippel Water, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Gordineer v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.