Legal Opinion

Central Oregon Irrigation District v. Deschutes County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1942PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This proceeding was instituted by Central Oregon Irrigation District, organized as an irrigation district under the laws of the state of Oregon, against Deschutes county, Oregon, Nick Peterson, and R. H. Fox and Jane Doe Fox, husband and wife, for a declaratory judgment interpreting § 110-925, O. C. L.” A., as determining the rights of the litigants in and to the south half of the southeast quarter of section 25, township 17 south, range 12 east, Willamette meridian, in Deschutes county.

The complaint, designated “application for declaratory judgment”, alleges that the tract of land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dewey v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. State v. SchenkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Duke v. American Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Goodwin & Co. v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hall v. HartleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API