Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Lively
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 14, 1930No. 20629PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
The petitioner, seeking release from the custody of the sheriff of Oklahoma county, whose warrant and authority is a commitment directing that petitioner be confined in the county jail until he obeys a certain maintenance order, and “until otherwise ordered by the court”, brings himself clearlv within the rule announced in Re John Curtis, 10 Okla. 660, 63 Pac. 963. See, also, Wells v. Wells, 46 Okla. 88, 148 Pac. 723. He is therefore entitled to be released. Writ granted.
MASON, C. J. , LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, HUNT, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ, concur.
Note. — See…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- In Re CurtisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- M. Dietz & Sons, Inc. v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957