Legal Opinion

Wells v. Wells

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1915No. 4344PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruihers, Judge. Suit for divorce 'by Phoebie Wells against Carl Richard Wells. From an order adjudging defendant to be in contempt for refusal to comply with a judgment and order of the court, he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

GALBRAITH, C.

This appeal by petition in error and case-made was taken for the purpose of reviewing the judgment and order of the district court of Hughes county adjudging the plaintiff in error to be in contempt for refusal to comply with the judgment and order of that court, entered in a divorce proceeding had therein, directing him to- pay the defendant in error $400 alimony and $100 counsel fee.

It appears from the record that the defendant in error, who was plaintiff -in the divorce suit, filed in that cause an application for a citation on the defendant, in which is recited the granting.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Smythe v. SmytheSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Steward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PlaistridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Ex Parte BighorseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Morgan v. National Bank of Commerce of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hadley v. HadleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API