Legal Opinion

In Re Curtis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Proceeding in Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer; J.:

This, is an original proceeding in this court for a writ of habeas corpus. It appears from the petition and the return of the sheriff that on the 21st day of March, 1900, in a certain action then pending for divorce in the district court of Canadian county, wherein one J. Maude Curtis was plaintiff and the said petitioner, John Curtis was defendant, upon due notice to said defendant, John Curtis, an order was made by said court and entered of record commanding the said defendant to pay to the clerk of said court the sum of fifteen dollars on or before the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Ex Parte LivelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API