Legal Opinion

Oppenheim v. Goodley

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1957No. Civ. No. 22027PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment decreeing that his homestead on certain property is set aside and declared void as to plaintiff, and that plaintiff is entitled to execute upon such property to satisfy a judgment against defendant.

The case was submitted to the trial court upon stipulation that defendant admitted ail the allegations of plaintiff’s first *326cause of action in his first amended complaint. No other evidence was introduced by either party.

It thus appears that in July, 1948, plaintiff filed an action against defendant in the Los Angeles Municipal Court on which plaintiff recovered a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wetherly v. StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Palen v. PalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Marelli v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Montgomery v. BullockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hing v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Engelman v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. McKnight v. FaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Tassone v. TovarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Nicolos v. GroverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API