Tassone v. Tovar
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
Gonzalo and Felicitas Tovar and their son Nefi Tovar appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Agostino and Catherine Tassone for fraudulent transfer. Appellants argue that there cannot be a fraudulent transfer, as to a creditor, of property subject to a declaration of homestead because such property is exempt from creditors up to the value of the homestead. We agree and reverse the judgment in its entirety.
Factual and Procedural Summary
In 1980, respondents sued appellants Gonzalo and Felicitas Tovar alleging fraud in the sale of real property. In October 1980, after suit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reddy v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Montgomery v. BullockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Oppenheim v. GoodleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re MorenoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Nagel v. WestenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Nagel v. WestenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021