Legal Opinion

Tassone v. Tovar

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1994No. B072599PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

Gonzalo and Felicitas Tovar and their son Nefi Tovar appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Agostino and Catherine Tassone for fraudulent transfer. Appellants argue that there cannot be a fraudulent transfer, as to a creditor, of property subject to a declaration of homestead because such property is exempt from creditors up to the value of the homestead. We agree and reverse the judgment in its entirety.

Factual and Procedural Summary

In 1980, respondents sued appellants Gonzalo and Felicitas Tovar alleging fraud in the sale of real property. In October 1980, after suit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reddy v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Montgomery v. BullockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Oppenheim v. GoodleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MorenoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2012
  2. Nagel v. WestenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Nagel v. WestenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API