Legal Opinion
Hing v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 20, 1918No. Civ. No. 1751PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On the 1st of April, 1901, the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States issued to respondent an endowment policy of life insurance. Thereafter respondent borrowed from said society the sum of one thousand dollars and assigned to appellant the said policy as security for the payment of said indebtedness, the bank undoubtedly acting as agent of the insurer in the matter.
The policy matured on the 1st of April, 1916, and there became due plaintiff the sum of $1,325.94, being the face value of the policy and the surplus reduced by said one thousand dollar loan. The insurer sent to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Briggs v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hall v. BeymerColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Southern Railway Co. v. FulfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Kennedy v. Pikush (In Re Pikush)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Agnew v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- McDaniel v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.