Legal Opinion

Raike v. Clayton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1915No. 1449PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Hunt County; A. P. Dohoney, Judge. Action by J. B. Clayton against F. M. Raike. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

Defendant in error obtained a judgment by default against plaintiff in error for the sum of $2,201.10 (the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees found by the trial court to be due on certain promissory notes made by plaintiff in error) and foreclosing a vendor’s lien on certain land existing in favor of defendant in error to secure the payment of the notes.

[1] In his petition defendant in error al leged that the notes were past due, and that plaintiff in error had refused to pay them. He further alleged that it was stipulated in the notes that plaintiff in error should pay 10 per cent, on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. BartellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. De Hymel v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Alston v. PiperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Ellis v. National City Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Roberts v. J. B. Colt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Slaughter v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Webster v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Gooch v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API