Legal Opinion

De Hymel v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1891No. 6939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Appellees brought this action against appellants, who are husband and wife, and against M. F. and J. P. Rice to recover the sum due on two promissory notes which the latter had executed to appellants to secure a part of the purchase money for a tract of land which they had conveyed by deed with general warranty; which, however, reserved a lien on the land to secure balance of purchase money. Appellants indorsed the notes of M. F. and J. P. Rice to appellees.

The land for which the notes were given may have been the separate property of Mrs. De Hymel, and at some time…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. E. P. N.E. R. R. Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Atlantic Fruit DistributorsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Maxey v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Raike v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API