Ellis v. National City Bank of Waco
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from the District Court of McLennan County. Tried below before Hon. Sam R. Scott.
1Opinion of the Court
EIDSON, Associate Justice.
It appears from the record in this case that the judgment entered in the court below was by consent of the parties. The recital in the judgment is, “All parties by consent in open court agree that plaintiff should have judgment for the amount sued for against all the defendants.”
The petition of plaintiff shows that it sued for the principal sum of $1,750, with interest at 10 percent per annum from the 10th day of December, 1904, and 10 percent of said amount as attorney’s fees. The judgment is dated the 29th of March, 1905. Hence, the amount sued for would be the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haas v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- A. C. Petri & Bro. v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Grier v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Hart v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raike v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Stanford v. ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Gooch v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939