Stuart v. Durland
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of foreclosure,. The only defense tendered was that of usury. The trial court found that there was no usury and entered a decree for plaintiff *212for the full amount of the mortgage, accrued interest, and taxes, paid by plaintiff upon the mortgaged premises, which became delinquent after the date of the mortgages. Defendants appeal.
Three mortgages are in controversy, all running for a period of five years, bearing interest from díte at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum, and executed by the same mortgagors to the mortgagee; but each mortgage being on a separate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norris v. W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
- First National Bank of Hailey v. GlennIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Green v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Stack v. Detour Lumber & Cedar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- United States Mortgage Co. v. MarquamOregon Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- War Finance Corp. v. ThorntonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Western Securities Co. v. NaughtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Duvall v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- General Fiberglass Supply, Inc. v. RoemerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Pierson v. FaulknerNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.