Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Faulkner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1938No. 30114PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tewell, District Judge.

This action was begun in the district court for Scotts Bluff county upon a promissory note. By agreement trial was had to the court. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the face amount of the note plus interest as per the terms of the note the defendants appeal.

The defendants admit the execution of the note, and allege that the contract evidenced by the note and the real estate mortgage given to secure the payment thereof was usurious. The material facts are not in dispute. On March 15, 1930, the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2,000,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. War Finance Corp. v. ThorntonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Stuart v. DurlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Austin v. ChalfantNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Chittenden v. KiblerNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lennox v. Housing AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Maska v. StollNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kinney Loan & Finance Co. v. SumnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. LevellNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Safeway Cabs, Inc. v. HonerNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API