Legal Opinion · Dissent

LaPointe v. United Engineers & Constructors

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 1, 1996Published

1DissentGlassman, Justice

Although I would not affirm the decision of the Board, I cannot agree with the Court’s conclusion that the effect of the language of the 1991 Workers’ Compensation Commission decision is dispositive of the issue in this case. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. It is well established that, unless without a rational basis, the factual findings of the Workers’ Compensation Board must be upheld on appeal if supported by competent evidence, even if the evidence supports a contrary result. Smith v. Great Northern Paper, Inc., 636 A.2d 438, 439 (Me.1994) (citing Dorey v. Forster Mfg. Co., 591 A.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  2. Nichols v. Cantara & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Smith v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Bourque v. Frank X. Pomerleau, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API