LaPointe v. United Engineers & Constructors
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1DissentGlassman, Justice
Although I would not affirm the decision of the Board, I cannot agree with the Court’s conclusion that the effect of the language of the 1991 Workers’ Compensation Commission decision is dispositive of the issue in this case. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. It is well established that, unless without a rational basis, the factual findings of the Workers’ Compensation Board must be upheld on appeal if supported by competent evidence, even if the evidence supports a contrary result. Smith v. Great Northern Paper, Inc., 636 A.2d 438, 439 (Me.1994) (citing Dorey v. Forster Mfg. Co., 591 A.2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Nichols v. Cantara & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Smith v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Bourque v. Frank X. Pomerleau, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984