Legal Opinion

Bourque v. Frank X. Pomerleau, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 5, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

The employee, Richard Bourque, appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission that affirmed a single commissioner’s denial of his petition for further compensation. Bourque’s petition for further compensation was based on the claim that he continued to suffer a partial incapacity as the result of a work-related injury sustained on October 4, 1974, while he was employed by Frank X. Pomerleau, Inc. (“Pomerleau”). See 39 M.R.S.A. § 55 (Supp.1983-1984).1 Because we find that the commissioner improperly applied the standard…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McQuade v. Vahlsing, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Mailman v. Colonial Acres Nursing HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Theriault v. Walsh Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Rines v. ScottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Franzose v. Alco Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Legassie v. Securitas, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. LaPointe v. United Engineers & ConstructorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. LaPointe v. United Engineers & ConstructorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API