Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Watkins, J.,
In this appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission the appellant, The Monongahela Connecting Bailroad Company, complains that the order was not supported by substantial evidence; and that the order would impair the ability of the appellant to serve its principal shipper, the Pittsburgh Works of Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation.
This case began with a complaint to the Public Utility Commission filed by the Co-Operative Legislative Committee, Bailroad Brotherhoods in the State of Pennsylvania and George W. Legge, a trainman employee of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Bridgewater Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Reading Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Erie-Lackawanna Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.