Legal Opinion
Bridgewater Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 45, 46 and 49PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
Per Curiam,
The orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission of December 12, 1955, are affirmed, at appellants’ costs. The opinion of this Court will be filed at a subsequent date.
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
July 5, 1956:
On May 28, 1954, the Department of Highways of the .Commonwealth filed its application with the Pennsylvania Public Utility -Commission. for-the alteration *88of the subway through which State Highway Route 761 crosses the tracks of The Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad below grade. At the same time and as a part of the same project the department filed a second application…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Somerset County v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Arsenal Board of Trade v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- GAF CORPORATION v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Higgins v. Public School Employes' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.