Legal Opinion

Erie-Lackawanna Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1965No. Appeal, No. 53PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal by the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Company, from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission directing the railroad to cease and desist from its practice of attaching its freight cars behind the caboose on train No. 99 on the route from Meadville, Pennsylvania, to Akron, Ohio, for the purpose of meeting schedules, and now practiced by the railroad on the average of twelve times a month, where the caboose is in use to house train crews, and further directing the railroad to limit such practice to emergency situations which do not include the mere…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terminal Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Reading Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Latrobe Water Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Havens v. TonnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Havens v. TonnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API