Legal Opinion
Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 14, 1967No. 15962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
This controversy arose out of a complaint lodged with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (P.U.C.) by the Co-Operative Legislative Committee, Railroad Brotherhoods in the State of Pennsylvania (Brotherhood) and George W. Legge, a trainman employee of the appellant, The Monongahela Connecting Railroad Company. The complaint charged an unsafe condition caused by appellant’s operations on the 29th Street hot metal bridge across the Monongahela River in Pittsburgh. The P.U.C. handed down an order which stated inter alia, that appellant was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tenneco, Inc. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N OF WEST VIRGINIADistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1973
- The Monongahela Connecting Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967