Legal Opinion

Jones v. General Motors Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1993No. 03952PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, General Motors Corporation. Appellants, Thomas Jones and Emma Jones, present the following question for our review:

Can there be a product liability cause of action under Section 402A of the Restatement of Torts, 2d, for fire damage to the vehicle itself, allegedly caused by a defect in the design or manufacture of the said vehicle?

Appellants’ Brief at 2. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Preliminarily, we point out that a motion for summary judgment is properly granted only where “the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. REM Coal Co., Inc. v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Laventhol & Horwath v. Dependable Ins. Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Werwinski v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Clarys v. Ford Motor Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Paquette v. Deere and Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. Tennis v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API