Legal Opinion
Werwinski v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 15, 2002No. 00-4323UnknownCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises out of a putative class action against Ford Motor Company relating to two allegedly defective components in the transmissions installed in Ford vehicles during the 1990-1995 model years. Asserting that Ford knew about the defective parts since at least 1991, appellants sued for breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, fraudulent concealment, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (“UTPCPL”), Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 73, §§ 201-1 et seq. (West 1993). The district court, after…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Lisa Earl v. NVR IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-19822District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- APT SYSTEMS, INC. v. APPLE INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Appalachian Land and Conservation Services v. Porter Equipment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.