Legal Opinion

Electric Utilities Co. v. Smallpage

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1934No. Docket No. 5081PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants have moved to dismiss the appeal which was taken from a judgment rendered and entered against the plaintiff for failure to° amend his third amended complaint within the time allowed after a demurrer thereto had been sustained. The motion to dismiss the appeal is made pursuant to rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, for failure on the part of the appellant to file his points and authorities as required, and on the further ground that the appeal was taken merely for delay and presents questions only of unsubstantial merit.

It appears from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boca & Loyalton R.R. v. Superior Court of Lassen Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Anglo California Trust Co. v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. In Re BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API