Legal Opinion

In Re Martin M.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 21, 2009No. 2 CA-JV 2009-0080, 2 CA-JV 2009-0081PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In these consolidated appeals by the State of Arizona, we are asked to decide whether A.R.S. § 28-3320 requires the juvenile court to notify the Motor Vehicle Division of the Arizona Department of Transportation (MVD) 1 when a minor has been adjudicated delinquent based on the offense of possession of marijuana, a class one misdemeanor, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-3405(A)(1), or whether the court may, in the exercise of its discretion, choose not to notify MVD of the adjudication. We hold the juvenile court is not required to notify MVD under these…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. AnwayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. StottsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Champlin v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting ProjectCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Arizona City Sanitary District v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Arizona City Sanitary Dist. v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting ProjectCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API