Mago v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.

*406OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In the wake of Parrot v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp., 212 Ariz. 255, 130 P.3d 530 (2006), the supreme court vacated our memorandum decision previously filed in this case and remanded for reconsideration. The issue is whether Ricky Mago, a lessee of a Mercedes-Benz E430, is eligible to recover under the Arizona Motor Vehicle Warranties Act (“Lemon Law”), Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) sections 44-1261 to -1267 (2003 & Supp.2005), or the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act (‘Warranty Act” or “Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312 (2000), for vehicle defects that substantially…